Stent or Bypass?

In the final analysis of this important international study, most outcomes were better with CABG than with PCI in patients with at least moderately severe left main or three-vessel disease.

Responsive image

In the SYNTAX trial, investigators compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease. The previously reported 1-year results showed similar rates of death and myocardial infarction (MI) with both procedures, more strokes with CABG, and more repeat revascularization procedures with PCI. The SYNTAX investigators now present their final results after 5 years of follow-up.

Of 1800 patients randomized, 90% of those assigned to CABG and 97% of those assigned to PCI completed 5-year follow-up. The overall adverse-event rate was lower with CABG (27%) than with PCI (37%; P<0.001). However, neither all-cause mortality nor stroke rate differed significantly between the two groups. The rates of MI and repeat revascularization were higher with PCI than with CABG (9.7% vs. 3.8% and 26% vs. 14%, respectively). The between-group differences increased with greater anatomical disease complexity and reached significance in the intermediate-risk category (SYNTAX score, 23–32), although the difference in mortality was nonsignificant in this group. In patients with SYNTAX scores ≥33, the overall adverse-event rate was 27% with CABG and 44% with PCI, including a statistically significant absolute increase in all-cause mortality of about 8% with PCI.

Dr. Aybek's comment

These results confirm and extend the earlier findings from this landmark trial. As in the previous reports, outcomes were similar with coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in the lowest tertile of SYNTAX score, whereas CABG outcomes were superior in the highest tertile. Longer follow-up now suggests that CABG beats PCI in the intermediate-risk group as well. However, this conclusion is likely to be controversial, because the benefit was driven primarily by repeat revascularizations and myocardial infarction. Patient preference for PCI will also influence decisions in these patients.


1. Mohr FW et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013 Feb 23; 381:629. (

2. Taggart DP. CABG or stents in coronary artery disease: End of the debate? Lancet 2013 Feb 23; 381:605. (

Prof. Dr. Tayfun Aybek

Cardiovascular Surgery

Landline: +90 850 532 63 00
7/24 Support: +90 534 520 53 17 (Telegram)

TOBB ETÜ Hastanesi, Yaşam Caddesi No:5 Söğütözü 06510 Ankara

​Cardiac Auto Transplantation (The procedure of explantation...

A 55 years old patient admitted to our hospital with a size of 25x20 left atrium, a severe mitral valve disease. The symptoms of the disease were pulmonary edema, asthma, low cardiac output, arrhythmia, extreme fatigue and abnormal weight loss. In order to contract the left atrium, a cardiac autotransplantation surgery, the procedure of explantation and reimplantation of the heart was performed on the patient.

81499 Times viewed

“Closed” Method Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Stent Treatment...

Endovascular Aortic Surgery is one of the best inventions in Cardiovascular Surgery during recent years. It reduced surgery risks and hospital stay considerably. Before the 2000s, Aortic Surgery was the most severe operation with the highest risk of complications. As technology is developing day by day, now, Aortic Surgeries can be performed with the closed method, easily.

33741 Times viewed